the way it works:
Munby - the big boss, sorted it out in https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2010/16.html
where in assessing the 'LAW' his first and highest 'authority' is
- It is convenient to start with what I said in British Broadcasting Corporation v Cafcass Legal and others [2007] EWHC 616 (Fam), [2007] 2 FLR 765, at para [12]:
" The legal framework
"It was – correctly – common ground between counsel that:
(i) The care proceedings in relation to William having come to an end, the restrictions imposed by s 97(2) of the Children Act 1989 no longer operate: Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878, [2006] Fam 83, [2007] 1 FLR 11...."
In other words I am the law... then.
which ...
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCOP/2023/43.html
B e f o r e :
____________________
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST | Applicant | |
- and - | ||
(1) SUDIKSHA THIRUMALESH (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) (2) THIRUMALESH CHELLAMAL HEMACHANDRAN (3) REVATHI MALESH THIRUMALESH *********** THE END |